New legal action focuses on redundancy laws

Tuesday 27 February, 2018 | By: Thomas Birkbeck

The Fair Work Ombudsman has brought proceedings relating to redundancy entitlements, in a new legal action against services company Spotless Services Australia Limited for allegedly contravening workplace laws when it terminated the employment of three workers at Perth International Airport.

Our Employer Assistance advisors can help you with all of the problems that come with managing people, including redundancy. Click here to learn more about membership with CCIQ
In documents lodged in the Federal Court, the Fair Work Ombudsman alleges Spotless Services Australia Limited contravened the Fair Work Act when it failed to pay a total of $29,013 in redundancy entitlements owing to the three workers.

The workers were among more than 30 whose employment was terminated by Spotless in 2015 after Spotless’s contracts to provide catering and hospitality services at Perth International Airport expired and were not renewed.

Spotless had employed one of the three workers, an administration/accounts manager, for 32 years and had employed the other two workers, one a retail manager and the other performing various roles, for about four-and-a-half years.

The Fair Work Ombudsman investigated after the workers lodged requests for assistance.

Under the Fair Work Act, redundancy entitlements are payable when an employee’s job is made redundant unless limited exceptions apply. One exception is where termination of employment is due to the ‘ordinary and customary turnover of labour’. The Fair Work Ombudsman alleges that exceptions do not apply to these three workers, and that they were entitled to redundancy pay.

Spotless has back-paid the three workers but has not admitted liability under the Fair Work Act.

shutterstock 687210436



 


The Fair Work Ombudsman alleges Spotless also contravened the Fair Work Act by failing to adhere to the requirement for employers to give written notice to Centrelink before dismissing 15 or more employees in certain circumstances.

Fair Work Ombudsman Natalie James says it is hoped the legal action will provide greater clarity around the situations in which redundancy entitlements must lawfully be paid.

“Federal Court consideration of this area of the law will serve to provide greater guidance to employers as to situations in which redundancy entitlements must be paid and situations in which Centrelink must be notified.”

Spotless faces maximum penalties of $25,500 to $51,000 per contravention for multiple alleged contraventions of the Fair Work Act. A case management hearing is scheduled for the Federal Court in Perth on 16 March, 2018.

This is a copy of an article published by the Fair Work Ombudsman on 27th February 2018

Post your comment

Comments

  • Paper Writing Services Online 11/06/2018 8:33pm (10 days ago)

    this is indeed one of the greatest things to see some of the greatest stuffs have to be told about these things here

  • Someone Write My Essay 06/06/2018 7:31pm (15 days ago)

    I was always taught that to treat an employee during the redundancy process in the way that UBS seems to have done would lead to claims for redundancy Andunfair termination because the company had already chosen to be dismissed before the Exercise was complete

  • Cheap Essay 04/06/2018 5:52pm (17 days ago)

    That's exactly why we didn't take him. Which is actually pretty unusual, usually if you get in on your grades we barely pay attention to your essays. Essays are mostly how to get in despite your grades/scores (though I can't remember his SAT).

  • write an assignment for me 25/05/2018 8:14pm (27 days ago)

    I just loved your way of presentation. enjoyed reading this .Thanks for sharing and keep writing. It is good to read blogs like this. As constantly, we appreciate yourself assurance and accept as true within us.

RSS feed for comments on this page | RSS feed for all comments